Caution: Digital Contents Fragile!

Reading through the articles and reports this week on collecting history online, I am left overwhelmed and with a sense of foreboding. Most of the readings at one point or another said directly or paraphrased these two words: “Digital fragility.”

In “Re-imagining Academic Archives,” Christopher Prom states that many different people control materials and documents in digital form and that important relationships exist between these forms and people. How do we preserve them? In the “Preserving Our Digital Heritage,” the authors claim, on average, a website dies in 44 days. This statement implies that digital documents, like websites, have a life- they die! They are fragile, like us human beings. I used to think that once you published some content on the internet it was there to stay…not anymore. On top of this morbid fact, people create new forms of technology and tools every day- it is constantly changing. One digital format may be replaced by another. Additionally, Kirschenbaum, Ovenden, and Redwine state in “Digital Forensics and Born Digital Content in Cultural Heritage Collections,” that approximately 90% of records generated today are digital! 

Digital records are ephemeral, rapidly changing, increasing, and essentially organic. Too many different formats, codes, catalogs, and preservers exist to standardize and keep up with these ever-changing and ever-dying digital materials. How can we, as historians, archivists, or simply preservers of the past, ensure or standardize digital preservation methods? Is standardization even possible? If not, how can we be sure not to lose some source of cultural and historical value? What are the real advantages and disadvantages of the massive plethora of digital formats and technologies? 

The “Preserving Our Digital Heritage Plan” report by the Library of Congress instilled some hope within me. It presents a detailed strategic plan to create library and archive networks, business models, and research bases to preserve the most important digital cultural and historical heritage of America. In perusing their website, a page called “Personal Archiving” encourages individuals to preserve their own important digital records and provides tools to do so.

I just do not like the reality that no concrete solution exists to preserve the important digital documents that are increasing and dying everyday with technology that is changing everyday.


3 thoughts on “Caution: Digital Contents Fragile!

  1. It seems pertinent to say here that events such as the shutdown led to many historians not having access to the Library of Congress, which is a resource that is valuable to us. Things that are even out of our control can seriously affect our access to resources.

  2. Sara, I like the idea of a professional standardization for digital history. While the technology may become archaic over time, standardization could cut down on the frequency of needed “data migrations.” I also think there is an argument that digitization could save some primary documents from being lost. My family has a large collection (or what my mom considers a pile of junk) of family documents and photos that go back to the early 19th Century. Many of them are in and advanced state of decay. We have digitized many of them in the hopes of preserving them for a longer period of time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s